My views on ‘artist statements’ are well known – that the best statement on a work imho is a well chosen title, and preferably short – although I do admit there have been some very clever rather long titles for creative works in all media, but it’s not a widespread trend. I’m sure all writers, composers, painters, sculptors – in fact all creative people at times have trouble naming some or all of their works to their satisfaction, and from personal experience, I know that in some stubborn cases it can take ages to get beyond a working title like ‘untitled/greys’ or ‘ blue one with silver /gold patches’ or similar kind of thing. Sometimes I have measured, signed, dated, and priced a work in my master list before it’s very own distinctive title finally emerges; one piece remained as ‘untitled’ for 3 years until someone asked to buy it and I felt forced to give it a name, not a very inspiring one but it was entirely appropriate to the design content. Naming is an essential part of the whole process, and I could no more farm out that part than any other part of the process, like quilting or binding.
Recently I have seen several calls for help in naming quilts on the various quilt art lists I read – there was even one by a PAM (Professional Artist Member) of SAQA (Studio Art Quilt Associates) which I see as rather amateurish, when considered. These calls for assistance are sometimes even matched with a little prize/give away for the person whose proposal is accepted by the artist. Rather sad imho, that someone is not up to the final little challenge in the overall process of creating a work of art. Today someone was looking for a snappy title for her blog – which is also a creative work, but I’m not sure she sees it quite that way.











